The Donald’s Tweets and Laments of His Fans Jump the Shark

By James A. Kidney The worst thing that can happen to an entertainer like Donald Trump happened last week when he tweeted the visual of his faux physical attack on CNN. Trump jumped the shark. He is not only a boor, which we have known for years, but his antics are old and tired.  Of course, he is still news.  He is still a huge, perhaps existential, threat to our Constitution and even our world. But his personality, upon which he relies for his dwindling popularity, has moved from entertaining or curious to “what else is new?” If you are unfamiliar with the term “jump the shark,” it means that a tv series has outlived its entertainment value.  It originates from a really boring, extended shot of the Fonz in the 1970s show “Happy Days” water skiing over a shark.  That was viewed by critics as a sign the show … Read more of this post . . .

New York Times: Don’t Abandon The Barricades of Serious Journalism!

By James A. Kidney [Ed note:  The New York Times plans to lay off hundreds of copy editors, a sign of financial pressure and a management strategy to beef up digital resources — they say.  The Times also eliminated its Public Editor — the person who entertained reader complaints about reporting and posted occasional columns assessing the Times reporting, sometimes critically.  In its place, the Times is offering up something called the Reader Center to receive comments on these changes.  You can send your comment to readercenter@nytimes.com.  Here is our comment (edited somewhat) sent to the executive editor through the Reader Center email site.] Dear Mr. Baquet, I am a nearly life-long subscriber to The Times (lately, the digital version), a former reporter (UPI, U.S. News) turned lawyer.  I  was married for 38 years to the late Sara Fritz, who I believe you knew from your LA Times days.  So … Read more of this post . . .

Reminiscences and Ruminations on Journalism

By James A. Kidney In the spring of 1966, when I was home in Chevy Chase, Md., on spring break from my freshman year, I ventured downtown to visit the newsroom of The Daily News, Washington’s tabloid newspaper, which was owned by the Scripps-Howard chain.  It was an old brick pile at 13th and Massachusetts Avenue, NW, a stone’s throw from where the Washington Post’s new headquarters are now.  The News was D.C.’s third newspaper, after the Post and the dowager of local journalism, The Evening Star. I was quite familiar with the bus route to The News and with its inside geography.  I had been there many times.  The building carried with it recent childhood memories.  The tiny, rickety elevator to the newsroom with a creaky steel grate enclosure did not put me off one bit. It, along with the sweet smell of printers’ ink wafting from the pressroom … Read more of this post . . .

Newspaper Musings — Reflections on the Olden Days and Modern Fears

By James A. Kidney

The Current Picture

Two recent events involving The Washington Post cause me to muse on changes in journalism.  First, the Post departed its long-time headquarters building on 15th St., NW, for a less majestic spot on 13th Street.  It is at least a symbolic retreat from the glory days of Watergate and the Pentagon Papers, noted with unusual sentimentality by many Post veterans.

wapo-record circulation promo adPerhaps more significantly, the Post printed a promotional ad last week that got much attention in professional journalism circles.  It is adjacent to this text.

The promotional ad was based on the Post’s claim that it had a bigger overall visitor total – clicks — on its website in October than The New York TimesPost owner Jeff Bezos, who founded Amazon.com, claimed that “What we’re doing with the post is we’re working on becoming the new paper of record.”

“Paper of record” was a hallowed term in journalism in the 20th century, always referring to The New York Times due to its diligence in coverage and the detail it often presented, such as full transcripts of important speeches by political leaders and congressional roll calls.  As the Times itself noted in a column by its public editor in 2004, there is no record the newspaper ever claimed the title formally, and doubt that even the esteemed Times would have deserved it or its reporters wanted it.

The Post never before dared call itself the “paper of record,” and it doesn’t deserve the appellation now.  Although one of the two or three best papers in the country (a bar lowering all the time), the Post closed New_York_Times_logo_variationits domestic bureaus years ago and has a far smaller news staff than the Times.  These discrepancies are reflected in the Post’s narrow coverage of national news.  The Post national coverage focuses almost exclusively on national politics and the federal government, with the occasional “blockbuster” series designed to win awards.  Other national news is relegated to a summary block of text, with a paragraph or two for each item headed by the name of the state where the reported event occurred. It does maintain a good foreign staff, albeit with fewer bureaus than the Times.

Read more of this post . . .Newspaper Musings — Reflections on the Olden Days and Modern Fears

%d bloggers like this: